Insulation and the 2012 Energy Code



Codes: They can be confusing to keep up with as we manage our busy masonry operations. Many of us have heard that the 2012 Energy Code will bring tremendous change to the industry. However, the changes to the code actually are widespread to the building industry and are met with compliance, with many of the current systems and products we are installing daily.

Insulation and the 2012 Energy CodeThe code does have many changes. For instance, entire heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems will require improvements to the mechanical systems and duct work. Window glazing and performance criteria are becoming more stringent, and the insulation requirements for the masonry industry have been written to higher performance levels. There are many rumors about how the changes will limit the available products with which we can build, once the code is adopted. This article will provide simple explanations to the code and provide some helpful insight to how the industry is dealing with the changes.

The code is a written model that will be adopted state by state, jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Therefore, the changes will not be across the board. To determine how the code will affect your operation, a visit to the Department of Energy’s website will provide you with additional information,

The energy code is important to all of us, because it is a positive step in the country’s reduction of energy consumption through design, construction and the operation of newer structures within our communities. The first step is important to react to the changes as soon as possible, since we all will be affected by the code sooner or later. Preparing now will make the transition easier.

The prescriptive energy code for the masonry industry is based, primarily, on the requirement for continuous insulation within the wall envelope. This becomes an issue when you look at the standard concrete masonry unit (CMU) and realize that the cross-webs allow for thermal bridging. By reducing the cross-web dimension, the efficiency of the unit is increased. However, this, by itself, is not the solution. With this in mind, it is now important to look at the criteria for compliance.

The thermal resistance (R Value, which indicated the ability of a wall system to resist heat transfer through the CMU wall) and the mass of a CMU wall can, in some cases, meet the code in the warmer climates. But this is not the standard case for most readers. Various types of insulation are used to develop the many single-wythe and cavity wall systems that we install. Rigid insulation, foam inserts, dry loose fill, injected foam, spray-on foam and proprietary block design round out the field increasing R values, typically from 5 to 25.

With the three methods available to determine code compliance, many of the current available masonry systems and designs will show acceptable numbers in at least one of the three criteria. Other important inherent factors of a CMU are the envelope’s design, specifications and materials that make up the assembly, as different manufactures of CMUs have similar, but different, mixes. This is one factor that can change the R value and the thermal mass performance of similar envelopes.

Other factors include geographical climate history, insulation specifications – either within the CMU or placed within the cavity – and the actual cross section of the CMU that comprises the wall design. See TEK 6-2B, R-Values and U-Factors (R-value = 1/U-factor) of Single Wythe Concrete Masonry Walls. The document will discuss thermal performance of a CMU wall and its thermal performance, based on material properties.

It is important to clear up the rumor that all masonry walls will require continuous insulation. There are many ways a designer can achieve compliance using complete building systems that will meet International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) requirements.

At the present time, three methods for determining compliance exist: prescriptive, compliance software (performance) and whole building analysis.

The prescriptive method uses a series of material or assembly requirements to meet compliance. For example, one can use the tabulated values for mass walls that specify requirements for continuous insulation to determine compliance. This is the method that most manufacturers and designers are using today. Many of the products and systems on the market that are available to the masonry industry gain compliance through this method.

Insulation and the 2012 Energy Code

The prescriptive method may not be a part of the next code, so it is important to keep an open mind to developing newer technologies and improvements to existing systems for future compliance to the code. Using the prescriptive tables is straightforward, and it also is limiting regarding design flexibility. The prescriptive tables are easy to use, but make some masonry wall types difficult or impractical to build.

The compliant software method or the performance method uses software developed to determine code compliance using a straightforward method. There are two popular programs available, ENVSTD and COMcheck. Though the programs differ with their capabilities, they both can offer the masonry industry thermal property constants for various masonry wall configurations. Depending on which part of the energy code that needs to be met, these programs can offer wall configurations meeting code as well as having compliance with the IECC in many cases.

Insulation and the 2012 Energy Code

COMcheck is a bit more complex to use, but offers options to modify many components within the structure that then can be compiled to achieve compliance, offering the design community the ability to use the products we know how to bid, construct and sell in energy-efficient buildings of the future. Once the designer compiles all of the information, if compliance is not met, they can adjust various properties of the building envelope to meet the code requirements. COMcheck can be downloaded for no charge at

Whole building analysis is not widely used today, but it is the upcoming method that will prevail in the near future. As discussed as the upcoming status quo, this method uses software that takes the entire building and performs a whole building analysis that will analyze annual total energy use, rather than individual component compliance. This method shows that the new method of design should reduce energy costs, when compared to standard building methods. The whole building method not only takes into account the wall types, but also includes the entire building envelope information, mechanical and lighting specifications to determine compliance.

Steve Fechino is engineering and construction manager for Mortar Net USA, Ltd. You can contact him at

Related Posts

  • 49
    April 2014 2013 Changes in The Masonry Code The most recent addition of the Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (TMS 402-13/ACI 530-13/ASCE 5-13) has been out since the fall of 2013. Are you aware of the changes? By Paul Curtis Since the late-1980s, the Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) has been meeting…
    Tags: masonry, design, code
  • 47
    Table of Contents January 2013 Volume 52, Number 1 FEATURES Mast Climbers How contractors are responding to the slowly improving economy and the effect on the mast climbing industry. Insulation A look at insulation and the 2012 energy code Building Information Modeling Understanding what BIM really will mean to the future of the masonry industry…
    Tags: industry, insulation, building, code, will, masonry, energy
  • 46
    July 2011 Thermal Mass Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance with Concrete Masonry Walls  Thermal mass is the energy saver in masonry buildings. By Tom Young The concept that massive walls absorb and retain heat, to be later released, has been understood since the time of the world’s earliest structures, many of which were built to benefit…
    Tags: wall, masonry, code, energy, insulation
  • 44
    March 2013 Sustainability Sustainable Masonry Solutions: The Key to Thermal Mass Solutions By Maria Viteri One of the biggest challenges for facility managers is operating a building for which decisions already have been made during the design phase. Yet, there is good news as more building owners and facility managers become part of the integrated…
    Tags: building, masonry, design, performance, energy
  • 42
    December 2014 Anchors, Connectors, and Fasteners Anchors and Energy Efficiency By Jeremy Douglas As energy codes continue to reach for higher standards and the cost of energy continues to rise, much attention now is being paid to the various components in our walls that may contribute to or diminish the overall energy performance of a…
    Tags: energy, wall, insulation, masonry, performance


Zachary Zuldema 1st Place (2nd Year) Winner Interview at the World of Concrete

Zachary Zuldema 1st Place (2nd Year) Winner Interview at the World of Concrete

Bill Dentinger 2015 Inductee MCAA Hall of Fame

Bill Dentinger 2015 Inductee MCAA Hall of Fame

John Smith, Jr.

John Smith, Jr. receives the 2015 MCAA C. DeWitt Brown Leadman Award

2015 MCAA Fastest Trowel On The Block Winner

2015 MCAA Fastest Trowel On The Block Winner

Daniel Furr 1st Place Winner

Daniel Furr 1st Place Winner (First Year), Masonry Skills Challenge

Synpro Products

Masonry Magazine Video News Interview: Michael Goyne

Hydro Mobile Inc

Interview with Kevin O'Shea of Hydro Mobile, Inc.

Interview with Mark Kemp – Chairman, MCAA

Interview with Masonry Contractors Association of America Chairman, Mark Kemp

Mortar Net Solutions

Interview with Steve Fechino from Mortar Net Solutions

Pullman Ermator

Interview with Lyndon Kelsey of Pullman Ermator

Keene Building Products

Interview with Jim O'Neill of Keene Building Products