Affordable, Deductible ‘YEEPs’
Could a year-end equipment purchase help you?
The fourth quarter of the year is when many publicly traded companies prop up their performance records to show more favorable year-end results. The owners and operators of many masonry businesses also “cook the books” for their smaller, more closely held masonry businesses, taking advantage of the tax rules for year-end equipment acquisitions.
Whether you are thinking about tax savings or are merely in the market for new equipment, the end of the year is a good time to consider acquiring that equipment. Most contractors and businesses will benefit from a full year’s worth of write-offs with only a month or two of payments, limiting the actual cash outlay for that new equipment while, at the same time, generating significant tax deductions for the 2008 tax year.
By waiting until January (for most of us using a calendar year), you will miss the current year’s Section 179 deduction — a whopping write-off for up to $250,000 in newly acquired equipment. Plus, a 50-percent bonus depreciation deduction is available for the purchase of qualifying property.
Year-end tax savings
A year-end tax strategy is simple in theory: Take maximum advantage of tax deductions in years when taxable income is high, and defer as many deductions as legally possible in those years when income is down. Others achieve year-end tax savings using a simple formula: Defer as much income as possible to the coming year, while making as many purchases as possible in the current year. Making the most of either formula requires constant tax awareness but, remember, taxes should not be the only reason for equipment acquisitions.
One of the most obvious strategies for small-business owners is to purchase furniture, office and other equipment — even business vehicles — near the end of the calendar year, rather than waiting until the following year. Year-end purchases can often be expensed and written off or deducted from the tax bill for the current year. This means a masonry business or a business owner in the 25 percent tax bracket can effectively reduce the cost of those year-end purchases by 25 percent within just a few months.
Among the rebates and business incentives of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 signed into law earlier this year was a provision that almost doubled the amount of deductible Section 179 expensing for 2008, to $250,000. At the same time, the threshold for reducing that write-off increased to $800,000. Unfortunately, it applies only to property purchased and placed in service in 2008.
Before the law changes, a masonry contractor or business could deduct or “expense” up to $128,000 of the cost of depreciable business assets for 2008. If the cost of qualified property placed in service during the year was more than $510,000, the ceiling for that business is reduced, dollar-for-dollar, by the amount over the applicable limit.
The new, temporary rules make no changes to the general rules for the types of property that are eligible for expensing. Generally, the property must be tangible or real property used in the trade or business and eligible for depreciation. The property must be used more than 50 percent of the time for business, as well as have been newly purchased.
Although a more complete list of eligible Section 179 property is available in IRS publications or their Web site (www.irs.gov), generally, computers, telephones, telephone systems, copiers, office furniture and other equipment and property acquired for business purposes and used in a masonry business. Investment property does not, of course, qualify for depreciation purposes, let alone the Section 179 write-off.
A ‘bonus’ for 2008
In early-2008, Congress resurrected bonus depreciation as part of the so-called “rebate” law changes in an effort to encourage business investment. The new law provides qualifying taxpayers 50 percent bonus depreciation of the adjusted basis of qualifying property, but only for that acquired in 2008.
To claim bonus depreciation, property must be:
- Eligible for basic depreciation (the modified accelerated cost recovery system or MACRS, with a depreciation period of 20 years or less)
- Computer software (off-the-shelf)
- Qualified leasehold property
- Purchased and placed in service during 2008.
Borrow or lease
Will the new equipment be purchased with borrowed funds? Or, would it be more advantageous for the masonry operation to lease? Leasing might mean losing the tax benefits of first-year, Section 179 write-offs as well as the 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance. Instead, the business gets an immediate tax deduction for all lease payments. Also, remember that under some circumstances, and with certain types of equipment, the full amount of the equipment purchase may be deducted in the first year.
The cost-reducing tax advantages under either the financing or the leasing option depend heavily on the situations of both the masonry business and its owner. By no means, however, should the decision be based solely on the first-year, out-of-pocket outlays.
Whether the masonry operation will benefit from newly acquired equipment at year-end, or whether it will have the profits to take full advantage of year-end tax breaks and afford the out-of-pocket expenditures necessary to buy or lease that equipment, will only become apparent as the end of the tax year approaches.
With a loan, a typical down payment is usually required. Most lenders ask for at least 10 percent or more of the purchase price as a down payment, although some lenders may require more. However, when planning a year-end equipment acquisition via the purchase route, why not investigate seller-provided financing?
A large, institutional lender is financing those purchases based on the masonry contractor or business’ financial history and prospects. Should the operation fail to repay the borrowed funds, the financial institution would, of course, take possession of the equipment. But, what would it do with the repossessed equipment and at what price?
Dealer, manufacturer or seller financing might, in some cases, be more expensive, but the up-front money is usually less. After all, should an equipment buyer default, the seller is in an excellent position to re-sell the repossessed equipment and can accomplish this far more efficiently and at a lower cost than a financial institution.
Acquiring equipment under a lease arrangement also involves certain upfront costs. The first and last lease payments may, for example, be required to enter into the lease. Although, in some cases, it may be possible to enter into a lease arrangement without an upfront payment, generally any advance payments required on a lease are less than a comparable loan down payment.
Particularly important today are interest rates. Although traditional loans are generally harder to obtain, interest rates are historically low. With a loan, the interest rate is the cost of borrowing money and explicitly stated in the loan agreement. With a lease, the implicit finance charge is rarely disclosed.
In fact, because of the way a lease is structured, it may be difficult to determine the interest rate. In some cases, a number of equal lease payments are due upfront, plus the monthly payments over the term and a lump-sum payment at the end of the lease. Because the amounts of the lease payment are different, it is more difficult to determine the actual interest rate charged for a lease. But ask!
More than more
Owners of masonry businesses operating as limited liability companies (LLCs), S corporations, or partnerships may be able to utilize a Section 179 deduction, the 50 percent bonus depreciation or other tax breaks on both the business entity’s taxes and their personal taxes. It should also be remembered that many states restrict some deductions, so consulting a qualified professional is important.
Overall, however, with prices discounted to move more services or jobs, postponed payments to vendors and/or suppliers, stepped up collection efforts as well as other fourth-quarter “gamesmanship” can contribute to a banner year. But just who is the masonry contractor or business owner trying to impress? Real, long-term savings come from a reduced tax bill. And, the best way to reduce that tax bill, especially in 2008, is year-end equipment acquisitions.
This year, in addition to the benefits of a full year’s depreciation with only a month or two or payments, masonry businesses can further lower their actual tax outlays using the soon-to-expire tax breaks created by the rebate tax law passed earlier this year.
Year-end equipment purchases (YEEPs) may be the way to go. Or, perhaps leasing is a more viable strategy. Either way, needed equipment added to the masonry business before the end of the tax year can be rewarding.
- 52April 2009 Finance Recovering With New Tax Breaks Mark Battersby The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, a nearly $800 billion stimulus package, includes nearly $300 billion in potential tax savings. Every masonry contractor can share in more than $75 billion in business tax benefits for 2009 and 2010. The Recovery Act helps ease…
- 34January 2011 Government Affairs Lame Duck: Wrapping up the 111th Congress Matthew B. Keelen and Michael J. Falencki Before November’s new Members of Congress officially begin their terms, the 111th Congress was attempting to finish legislation and adjourn for the year. The two issues most pressing – expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts…
- 34Rentals By Maureen M. Upchurch Mason contractors of every size in every location are eventually saddled with the prospect of equipment purchases. In some cases, equipment necessary for the completion of a job will break down, be rendered obsolete, or be utilized across town or across the region on another project. This challenges masons with…
- 31October 2010 Government Affairs The Value of Restoration Matthew B. Keelen and Michael J. Falencki As Congress returns at the beginning of September after being on summer recess for over a month, much of the attention is focused on the upcoming November elections. With attention to lagging jobs and economy numbers, many pundits predict that…
- 31April 2013 Government Affairs Estate Tax Op-Ed Congressman Tom Rice (SC-07) Family business owners and entrepreneurs are all too familiar with our country’s onerous estate tax. The fiscal cliff negotiations at the end of last year halted the 55 percent estate tax rate from again taking effect, but the negotiated 40 percent rate and $5.12…